Burgman 650 vs 400 ?

Phil Tarman

Site Supporter
Moderator
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
9,367
Age
81
Location
Greeley, CO
Bike
2010 Silver NT700VA (ABS)
Yoda, you said you've got your 650 Burgman. Compare it to the 400 for us. Please!
 

Yoda

Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
345
Location
Western New Mexico (Ramah)
Bike
2021 Suzuki 650 VStrom; N
Re: Give Us a Report

I picked up my new Burgman 650 last Tuesday at Oklahoma Honda-Suzuki, in Oklahoma City. I can wholeheartedly, enthusiastically recommmend this company. I flew in to OKC Monday and stayed overnight. Their sales manager, Shawn Bostwick, picked me up at my hotel Tuesday morning. Superb, friendly service! The price shown on Cycletrader for the 'Burg was as expected, the only addition a $60 document fee. Period. Why wouldn't either of our local Suzuki dealers match their price to keep the business here at home? I will never understand. After a quick wire transfer from USAA bank, I loaded up and left for Albuquerque before noon.
The big Burg actually weighs about 40 pounds more than an NT700, but feels lighter due to the very low c.g. It has a 638 cc engine, just 42 cc less than the NT, but only (an estimated) 50 hp at the crank. The first sensation is of a very smooth, solid ride. It is much quieter than the single cylinder 400 Burgman, and I believe even a bit quieter than an NT.
My previous scooter experience with CVT transmissions on the Honda PCX150, and Burgman 400 are completely different from the electronically controlled CVT on the Burg 650. The larger engine bike utilizes an automatic multiplate wet clutch that begins engagement at only about 2,000 rpm. The others use a dry centrifugal clutch that don't start hooking up until 3,500 to 4,000 rpm. At light throttle input, the 650's electronics maintain a much lower rpm during acceleration. But, with greater throttle, higher rpm is called for by the electronics.
I have not wrung it out for max performance yet, as I just finished the 600 mile breakin period on the trip home. Suzuki (and Burgman forum members concur) says to keep rpm's below 4,000 during the breakin period, while varying the load and rpm as much as possible. This is apparently as much for the kevlar / rubber belt and pulley faces as it is for the engine conformation process. I made every effort to comply.
I have read others affectionately call the big Burgman "Lardy", and compare it similarly to a Goldwing. Perhaps a mini-Goldwing is more accurate. Nevertheless, it is very comfortable for both riders, with large seats, excellent room for feet, and good weather protection. No navigation, sound system, or cruise control here, but otherwise an apparently good machine for touring. Time will tell. My wife says it has the best back seat of the few bikes she has ridden on, and especially likes the factory backrest. One promising aspect was the fuel economy on the ride home - about 55 mpg staying within the 4,000 rpm / 65 mph limitation during breakin.
Photos and more detail about the experience will be forthcoming. Stay tuned.
 
OP
OP
Phil Tarman

Phil Tarman

Site Supporter
Moderator
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
9,367
Age
81
Location
Greeley, CO
Bike
2010 Silver NT700VA (ABS)
Re: Give Us a Report

Thanks! We look forward to updates.
 
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
716
Location
McAllen, Texas
Bike
2010 Silver NT700
Re: Give Us a Report

Ah, Rich - I see the farkle dollars floating away now!!! I suspect your first visit will be Kiwi Dave's for some luggage.

Congrats - I've only ridden the big Burg once, but I liked it a lot. From everything I've heard, you've got a great machine there.

Hope to see the Burg at Spearfish next year.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
8
Location
Tulsa
Bike
n/a
Re: Give Us a Report

I picked up my new Burgman 650 last Tuesday at Oklahoma Honda-Suzuki, in Oklahoma City. I can wholeheartedly, enthusiastically recommmend this company. I flew in to OKC Monday and stayed overnight. Their sales manager, Shawn Bostwick, picked me up at my hotel Tuesday morning. Superb, friendly service! The price shown on Cycletrader for the 'Burg was as expected, the only addition a $60 document fee. Period. Why wouldn't either of our local Suzuki dealers match their price to keep the business here at home? I will never understand. After a quick wire transfer from USAA bank, I loaded up and left for Albuquerque before noon.
The big Burg actually weighs about 40 pounds more than an NT700, but feels lighter due to the very low c.g. It has a 638 cc engine, just 42 cc less than the NT, but only (an estimated) 50 hp at the crank. The first sensation is of a very smooth, solid ride. It is much quieter than the single cylinder 400 Burgman, and I believe even a bit quieter than an NT.
My previous scooter experience with CVT transmissions on the Honda PCX150, and Burgman 400 are completely different from the electronically controlled CVT on the Burg 650. The larger engine bike utilizes an automatic multiplate wet clutch that begins engagement at only about 2,000 rpm. The others use a dry centrifugal clutch that don't start hooking up until 3,500 to 4,000 rpm. At light throttle input, the 650's electronics maintain a much lower rpm during acceleration. But, with greater throttle, higher rpm is called for by the electronics.
I have not wrung it out for max performance yet, as I just finished the 600 mile breakin period on the trip home. Suzuki (and Burgman forum members concur) says to keep rpm's below 4,000 during the breakin period, while varying the load and rpm as much as possible. This is apparently as much for the kevlar / rubber belt and pulley faces as it is for the engine conformation process. I made every effort to comply.
I have read others affectionately call the big Burgman "Lardy", and compare it similarly to a Goldwing. Perhaps a mini-Goldwing is more accurate. Nevertheless, it is very comfortable for both riders, with large seats, excellent room for feet, and good weather protection. No navigation, sound system, or cruise control here, but otherwise an apparently good machine for touring. Time will tell. My wife says it has the best back seat of the few bikes she has ridden on, and especially likes the factory backrest. One promising aspect was the fuel economy on the ride home - about 55 mpg staying within the 4,000 rpm / 65 mph limitation during breakin.
Photos and more detail about the experience will be forthcoming. Stay tuned.
I realize I'm coming two years too late at this YODA but I'm very interested in knowing what those last two years have been like with the B650. I've read, studied, inquired and sat on the 650. I don't need to go over specs. with you, you own it. I must admit to being extremely fearful of the (hopefully only in the past) ECVT issues. What has been your experience? Should one expect to ever suffer with such matters? Was moving from the 400 worth it? What have been your pro's and con's, comparisons and contrasts for either bike?

I hate to be full of questions but, I'm really trying to narrow this decision down. For the riding I will be doing 95% of the time, either bike: NT, B650 or B400 will work. For the riding I hope to be doing (light touring) either bike should work fine.

I've been on scooters, I like scooters, I like how incredibly functional they are. That being stated, there's still something about riding the NT that appeals. Can you help? Thanks.
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
8
Location
Tulsa
Bike
n/a
I used to be a moderator at BurgmanUSA. I advise you to do some research there on CVT failures. I wouldn't ask the question of whether to buy one there, or if the problems are fixed. I can tell you the answer now.

The new version changed the clutch engagement, but did nothing to fix the cause of the CVT failures. The bad part is there is no warning. You could find yourself stranded at the end off the block, or 500 miles from home.

I have a friend with 3 of them at home. Two are parts bikes. You could look at a CVT failure as just part of the cost of ownership, and if you are mechanically inclined, the cost of repair it's not much. But if you have too pray for someone else to repair it, it it's the value of the bike.

I know of some that lasted 17,000 miles, others that lasted 35-50,000 miles, and one that made over 100,000 miles. It's a crash shoot. On the other hand, how long will a NT last?

Chris
Well I guess that's straight from where it counts most. Decision made; it's either the 400 or the NT. Thanks Chris.
 
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
716
Location
McAllen, Texas
Bike
2010 Silver NT700
Well I guess that's straight from where it counts most. Decision made; it's either the 400 or the NT. Thanks Chris.
As someone who, like Chris, has owned both a Burgman 400 and (now) an NT, I can tell you that the reason I did not upgrade from a 400 to a 650 was because of the CVT failures. I now have over 57,000 miles on my NT, bought new, three years ago. At 50k miles or so, if I owned the Burgman 650, I would be looking at a CVT failure. The NT has been nothing but rock solid.

As to "400 vs NT", they are such totally different machines - it really depends on what you want from a bike. In my case, I had retired when I bought the 400 and found I had time for long touring rides. Deep South Texas to Las Vegas, Deep South Texas to Miami - you got the idea. The 400 was solid too, but not really suited for touring, especially in the west where the speed limits are higher. But, if you intend short trips and/or local fun rides, the Burgman is a great bike.
 

DirtFlier

Site Supporter
Joined
Dec 13, 2010
Messages
3,331
Location
Troy, OH
Bike
2010 Silver NT700V/ABS
Initially, it feels as if there should be a 6th gear but eventually I stopped worrying about the RPM on the slab and just enjoyed myself. The NT's engine doesn't seem to care what it's taching at 70-75 mph and there are many on this list who live out west where they can ride much faster than 75 and they're not complaining.
 

mikesim

Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
3,330
Age
74
Location
Union, MO
Bike
NT700, Red, #989,
Initially, it feels as if there should be a 6th gear but eventually I stopped worrying about the RPM on the slab and just enjoyed myself. The NT's engine doesn't seem to care what it's taching at 70-75 mph and there are many on this list who live out west where they can ride much faster than 75 and they're not complaining.
Yup! On my recent trip to Spearfish, most of the time Traveller was cruising at 80-85 without complaint.

Mike
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2013
Messages
1,112
Location
Otsego, MI
Bike
'10 NT 84 BMW R100RT Ural
At RoadRunner event there was a couple who road 650, they where some of the best ridding couple I ever seen. Both were small people, amazing riding couple. He said when over in Europe,they rented a NT and found that a nice ride on a tour. I think they where in their 60's, and on twesties could keep up with any sensible rider (meaning no sport bike fools). I even told my brother he might look at the trike version (one leg), but he took vanity and got the H-D Pingel shifter.
 

Tonydtiger1971

Guest
Yup! On my recent trip to Spearfish, most of the time Traveller was cruising at 80-85 without complaint.

Mike
What were the RPM set at? There are times when the RPM's seem higher than other times.
 
OP
OP
Phil Tarman

Phil Tarman

Site Supporter
Moderator
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
9,367
Age
81
Location
Greeley, CO
Bike
2010 Silver NT700VA (ABS)
At 85myh, rpm = 6,020. At 80, it's only 5,666. 70mph= 4,960. 708.333/10mph.

So, redline in 5th is 120mph. I've never been able to do that. 108 is my personal "best" on the NT. I got to 126.8 on the Connie and backed out of it when the handlebars started a slow waggle. I rode another 140 miles back to Ft Morgan at mostly 80...and found a 6" nail in the rear tire the next morning.
 

junglejim

Site Supporter
Joined
Apr 26, 2012
Messages
2,119
Location
Northern WI
Bike
Tiger 800, NT sold
Phil is spot on with his numbers. But that is only throry. Consider wearing the tires down 1/8" and then recalculate. That 1/8" of tread translates to about 3/4" of cricumfrence which is a 10% decrease inspeed or 10% increase in rpm whichever way you want to look at it.

Most stock NTs will reach red line, but with the windscreen all the way down. And if they get there they are sure out of juice. Mine was able to reach red line, but there was nothing left. (I didn't say I was riding it at the time)
 
OP
OP
Phil Tarman

Phil Tarman

Site Supporter
Moderator
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
9,367
Age
81
Location
Greeley, CO
Bike
2010 Silver NT700VA (ABS)
In theory, Jim may be right with his calculations of increasing speedo/odo error with tire wear, but I sure never notice it when comparing speed to GPS.
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
499
Location
Corinth, TX
Bike
2013 Yamaha FJR1300
Most stock NTs will reach red line, but with the windscreen all the way down. And if they get there they are sure out of juice. Mine was able to reach red line, but there was nothing left.
Means the bike is "perfectly" geared.
 

mikesim

Site Supporter
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
3,330
Age
74
Location
Union, MO
Bike
NT700, Red, #989,
What were the RPM set at? There are times when the RPM's seem higher than other times.
What Phil said. You may "think" 6K rpm is high and the bike may be buzzy, but it is not. Honda's love to rev and at 6K Traveller is very smooth. After a long spell on the slab doing 85 when you have to slow to 70, it seems like you are crawling.

Mike
 

Tonydtiger1971

Guest
What Phil said. You may "think" 6K rpm is high and the bike may be buzzy, but it is not. Honda's love to rev and at 6K Traveller is very smooth. After a long spell on the slab doing 85 when you have to slow to 70, it seems like you are crawling.

Mike
Ok, that sounds about right. I was noticing that at 60 the RPM's were between 4000 and 4300.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
644
Location
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Bike
Black 2009 NT700
At 100kph (62mph) my tacho is showing 4200 rpm.

Recently I have been thinking seriously about a Burgy 650, not as a replacement for the NT but possibly for the Suzuki GS500F which I am now finding a bit uncomfortable.
I have been doing some research and as far as I understand it, if you replace the Primary Pulley bolt regularly there should be no CVT problems for at least 100,oookm (62K miles).
I have ridden one a few times in Japan and was very impressed except for the very heavy steering.
The B650 has many of the "features" of the NT which makes it appealing, such as storage (3 glove boxes and under-seat), weather protection and no chain maintenance.
Also available are several different options for panniers and top boxes.
If it had both, and many do, it would have a lot more storage than the NT but it could weigh it down quite a bit.
A bigger fuel tank would be nice too but it would be easy enough to carry a 5L fuel can or bladder to increase the range (we often need that hare in OZ).
Any further thought anyone?

Macka
 
Top Bottom