Consider this the latest installment in Chris' gear addiction saga. I have had four one-piece riding suits over the past decade or so, and ended up ebay'ing all of them. These included a regular Roadcrafter (too heavy, too much material, and hard to store on bike); an Olympia Phantom (size large way too big in the torso), and an Olympia Stealth (size medium, great in torso but short in legs and arms). You'd think I'd learn.
But I just jumped in the pool again for a sale-priced Roadcrafter Ultralight. (Aerostich selling these off to make way for slightly upgraded Tactical Light.) I think I have finally found my one-piece match. Perfect fit, packs easily in my NT top case, and works great on the bike. I have also decided over the summer than mesh is overrated and that a light non-mesh garment with good vents (exactly like the ultralight) can actually be cooler.
I expect to continue to use my heavier Oly AST and Darien pants for touring and longer rides, but for jaunts around the area or out to my favorite hiking spots, the Ultralight will be getting a lot of use.
On the topic of riding gear, I wish there were some independent study evaluating how well ballistic nylon and armor actually work in crashes. I recognize it would be difficult to do, but riders collectively spend a lot of money on gear, and most end up making subjective decisions about the level of protection that's needed. Or so it seems to me. Does shoulder armor help? Hip armor? Is 500 ballistic nylon really better than 200? Does CE armor rating mean anything in practice? How effective are back protectors or chest protectors? The best comments I have found so far are on the Aerostich site. Because they actually repair their gear, they at least have some understanding on how the gear performed. But even their comments are scattered and anecdotal, and largely reflect the abrasion-protection a piece of gear provided, rather than injury protection.
But I just jumped in the pool again for a sale-priced Roadcrafter Ultralight. (Aerostich selling these off to make way for slightly upgraded Tactical Light.) I think I have finally found my one-piece match. Perfect fit, packs easily in my NT top case, and works great on the bike. I have also decided over the summer than mesh is overrated and that a light non-mesh garment with good vents (exactly like the ultralight) can actually be cooler.
I expect to continue to use my heavier Oly AST and Darien pants for touring and longer rides, but for jaunts around the area or out to my favorite hiking spots, the Ultralight will be getting a lot of use.
On the topic of riding gear, I wish there were some independent study evaluating how well ballistic nylon and armor actually work in crashes. I recognize it would be difficult to do, but riders collectively spend a lot of money on gear, and most end up making subjective decisions about the level of protection that's needed. Or so it seems to me. Does shoulder armor help? Hip armor? Is 500 ballistic nylon really better than 200? Does CE armor rating mean anything in practice? How effective are back protectors or chest protectors? The best comments I have found so far are on the Aerostich site. Because they actually repair their gear, they at least have some understanding on how the gear performed. But even their comments are scattered and anecdotal, and largely reflect the abrasion-protection a piece of gear provided, rather than injury protection.
Last edited: