Is that the same as the MPS system? It has been used on Bell helmets (under license) for many years now.
Not quite - I would guess 6D's OTS is better. MIPS requires a small plastic shell piece that slides but doesn't allow for additional impact protection, nor full head rotational impact since it's only the top portion of the helmet liner. 6D has a small blurb on their
tech page in comparison to the MIPS standard.
MIPS: is a simplistic shear-plane mated to the helmet liner’s inner surface and is designed to improve the amount of slip that your head naturally has within the helmet. If your head cannot move within the helmet very far because it’s fit properly (snug), and the shape of the skull (as mentioned above) naturally constraining its movement, then these types of systems cannot do much work (unless you’re crushing the EPS liner in a high energy crash at the same time). Additionally, a shear-plane has no ability to mitigate linear accelerations.
6D is on the left here, MIPS is on the right. As you can see MIPS will rotate around in an impact, as will 6D... but 6D has the rubber spacers which can stretch/sheer in any direction for angular protection and also acts as a secondary buffer for any impact. With MIPS there is no space (buffer) nor anything to slow excessive rotational impact - the plastic liner in MIPS just breaks free and spins on it's own, as I understand it. And that's if there's any room in a snug helmet to break-free and move.
Edit: The difference here is that MIPS uses your head and the plastic liner for rotational impact - but heads can't really rotate much in helmets - hence the problem. With 6D the inner shell allows for rotational protection even if your noggin is strapped in tight.