karl
Site Supporter
Correct. The Suzuki is light, has great MPG's, is bullet proof, will move down the road at a good clip and.....is cheep. Almost half the price as some of these others. Go figure.Nice bike, but is it too heavy? Katherine is probably the best judge, but I am not sure what it offers over the Super 10 in terms of functionality and it's $4-5k more expensive.
Interestingly, Suzuki looks to be selling all the '12 Wee Stroms that they can make.
Honda is looking to the future with the NC. They forcast continued increases in fuel prices and the NC is designed for fuel economy. They targeted 65mpg. The low rpm's also help with that. Since some people may move from cars to motorcycles due to gas prices the auto transmission will help with the conversion. Many drivers today have never had to operate a vehicle with a clutch. Honda's visions often fail to materialize but everyone can't be Steve Jobs.I really don't know when Honda will bring the Cross-Tourer to the US. They brought the NT after God knows how many years. They tried to market the DN-1 (Which went over like a pregnant pole vaulter). Will see what they so with the NC-700X. Doubtful that will appeal to LD riders.
Motorcyclist reviewed the NC and said that it was more "Stylish" Than the NT. They were trying to compare apples and oranges.
I have no clue as to what a stylish motorcycle is. The NT is a touring bike for sure--the NC is "sort of"
That comment makes the DN-01 come to mind. And it bears more than a passing resemblance, in design and the target market, to the NC700. At least the NC is more realistically priced than the DN-01's MSRP was...Honda's visions often fail to materialize but everyone can't be Steve Jobs.
Yes, I forgot to mention that a low entry level price was also part of their plan. Nothing I read actually mentions anyting about adventuring touring. I think it might be more of a styling element.That comment makes the DN-01 come to mind. And it bears more than a passing resemblance, in design and the target market, to the NC700. At least the NC is more realistically priced than the DN-01's MSRP was...
With a minimum seat height of 32.9" and max of 33.7", would be way too tall for this 29" inseam vertically challenged fellow.Don't forget the new kid on the block, Triumph Explorer
That's what I thought about the Super Ten but it drops about 4 inches as soon as it comes off the side stand.. I'm at 28" and it feels better than the ST1300 from that point of view.. also, narrower seat in the front helps.With a minimum seat height of 32.9" and max of 33.7", would be way too tall for this 29" inseam vertically challenged fellow.
But the bike appears to be aimed squarely at the BMW GSers.
Good looker though.
Guess I would have to sit on one to see for sure. Nearest Triumph, and only Triumph dealer in Louisiana, is in New Orleans.That's what I thought about the Super Ten but it drops about 4 inches as soon as it comes off the side stand.. I'm at 28" and it feels better than the ST1300 from that point of view.. also, narrower seat in the front helps.