This would be a cool second bike.....
Personally, I never understood the hype over the original 500.
![]()
I think there's much cooler bikes from the 89-90 time period that deserve more attention.
I like the new GB350 about 5x more than I ever liked the GB500. The 350 is a normal bike and not meant to look like a Norton Max being raced at the Isle of Man with low bars, solo seat, big tank, etc. I rode the GB500 once or twice when they were new and was quite underwhelmed. It was Ok when zipping around city streets and back roads but if you ever had to get on an interstate, it was done. The MSRP was very close to the Trans-Alp or Hawk 650GT and both were much, much better for all around fun.
If they ever brought the GB350 here, I'd be seriously interested in buying one!![]()
This is aimed at the Asian market and will sell for less than $5000. They are turning them out like sausages....Honda has RE India right in its cross hairs......I wonder if owners will actually ride this GB. The last one is a $10K collectors' item that nobody rides. Low mileage examples just get passed around to the next owner who wants to stick it in their living room after the seller gets tired of looking at it.
The CB-1 didn't have the chassis for the motor, and the Hawk didn't have the motor for the chassis. I have owned both since new, and the CB-1 has only 6K miles. Kind of sums up how I feel about it.Yes. Both the NT650 Hawk GT and CB1 were on the list of bikes that I was also looking at during the same time.
The CB1 was basically a stripped-down 400cc Sportsbike. I probably got too many tickets on it or killed myself on it. I am kind of glad that did not happen for this bike either.
The Hawk GT would have been a great bike for me too. I bit more sporter than the GB500. I would've probably only gotten speeding tickets on that bike.
I had both a 1976 CB550K and a 1976 CB750A Hondamatic during that time. I hated both of those bikes and I still do to this day.
The CB-1 didn't have the chassis for the motor, and the Hawk didn't have the motor for the chassis. I have owned both since new, and the CB-1 has only 6K miles. Kind of sums up how I feel about it.My Hawk has a reworked suspension with a Fox shock in the rear. It has a full Supertrapp exhaust which helps with the power. But it is still a sport bike chassis with a lazy cruiser motor. The CB1 has a very close ratio gearbox, which requires a lot of shifting. It gets old during normal riding. And 7200rpm at 60 mph is tiring. I guess I am getting old.
![]()
If it was a 350 twin, it would just be another run of the mill bike. But having the cadence and torque of a single, makes it desirable imho. As you say.....it has a sound you could listen to all day. It even has a usable helmet lock and center stand.The more I look at this bike, the more I like it. The Standard model looks better in my opinion over the Sport model.
I sure love the sound of a Thumper...
This would be a cool second bike.....