Makes it easier for the pillion to fall on the riderI continued to be dumbfounded by the absurd seat heights of modern bikes. Most or all of them have under 6" of rear wheel travel so why does the back end have to be jacked-up so it looks similar to a motocross bike with 12" of travel?
I think it is so they can fit the big catalytic converter and mufflers under the engine and still have ground clearance for the rare event that they get onto unpaved roads.I continued to be dumbfounded by the absurd seat heights of modern bikes. Most or all of them have under 6" of rear wheel travel so why does the back end have to be jacked-up so it looks similar to a motocross bike with 12" of travel?
It has nothing to do with the catalytic converter, it’s how sporty bikes have been built for a couple of decades now, engine and rider forward, get the weight forward for good handling……there is a reason today’s factory GP machines have ass up hands down seating, it’s all about handling at the the extremes.
Yes, but virtually all low seated bikes are cruisers. The feet forward riding position is a definite turn off for me. It is just not comfy for long distance riding. Has anyone ever seen a picture of either General's Lee or Grant with their feet under their horse's chin? I rest my case....
