I am not very popular on this forum. I am all for high gas taxes.
Chris you are not going to get elected governor or president with that as your campaign pledge.
Brad
That would be OK if 1. That is were the revenue went to, and 2. that the spending on said infrastructure was done smartly, with quality in mind, and with out kickbacks. Why can't we build a road that is smooth and can last the winter like in Germany. I have seen it, most contract people are very uneducated about the contracts that they let. Only concerned with lowest bidder and not so much quality or process. Also lack of supervision of said contracts. Been there seen it. Call me cynical in my old age.When we compare our gas prices with the Europe and Australia, it's obvious that there's been a decision made to artificially suppress them. I tend to agree with Chris that our gas taxes need to be higher and that the revenue from that should be used to rebuild our infrastructure. It's in terrible shape in most states.
I actually have to agree with Phil for a change and Chuck. If a contractor demonstrates quality work in the past, they get prefference over those that show slipshod work. Low bid on face masks doesnt work. It doesnt work on public safety either. Graft is rampant in WA state as far as roads. We have the best politicians that money can buy. I wont bore you with the details. Anyone check out the price of crude oil on the market today? NOW is the time to raise the federal gas tax. Ike built the interstate system. WE can fix it.Unfortunately, I have to agree with what Chuck says. Quality needs to be drastically updated. Automatically going with the low bidder sure doesn't contribute to that.
I know. Lord help us if we went back to the days of JFK, and Ike, and the space program. "Ask not what your country can do for you...." is most unpopular.Chris you are not going to get elected governor or president with that as your campaign pledge.
Brad
Quality needs to be drastically updated. Automatically going with the low bidder sure doesn't contribute to that.
Not to throw a monkey wrench into everyone's opinion, but what the hell, it's never stopped me before :LOL: . It is not the contractor that designs the road, he just builds the road to the engineer's specification. If you have ever seen an engineering spec for a highway it is quite detailed. The engineer specifies the base, i.e (base shall be constructed with a 6" base of compacted 2 minus aggregate, then overlayed with a 3" base of compacted 1" minus limestone. Asphalt overlay shall consist of a single layer of 4" asphalt consisting of no less that 75% crushed limestone with a 25% asphaltic substrate. Those are specs that I just pulled out of the air for illustration so don't quote me on those. If you are interested a detailed spec on approved road construction specs can be found here https://www.astm.org/Standards/road-and-paving-standards.html.I actually have to agree with Phil for a change and Chuck. If a contractor demonstrates quality work in the past, they get prefference over those that show slipshod work. Low bid on face masks doesnt work. It doesnt work on public safety either. Graft is rampant in WA state as far as roads. We have the best politicians that money can buy. I wont bore you with the details. Anyone check out the price of crude oil on the market today? NOW is the time to raise the federal gas tax. Ike built the interstate system. WE can fix it.
Yes, the big trucks are the worst offenders when it comes to highway damage. Theoretically, that is accounted for in the higher user fees the big trucks are assessed but somehow I don't think it covers the wear. Railroads could contribute much more in hauling freight however these days everybody wants their stuff yesterday and the one thing railroads ain't is speedy.I think its the large trucks that cause most of the damage. To bad they can't do more with the railroads. Get the fright back on the trains and leave the highways for the cars.
No Chuck, I haven't ridden much in Colorado lately, but I'd love to! The point of my post was to point out that the problem with our roads is more complicated than shoddy workmanship on the part of the contractor. It is also not a problem that can be fixed by merely throwing more money at it, although it sounds tempting. Increasing fuel taxes sounds easy but remember the people have to approve it but before they do they must have confidence that it will be money well spent. Further, our ability to tax is finite and there are many competing purposes for our tax dollars. The very definition of economics is "the allocation of scarce resources that have alternative uses", and at this point, tax dollars are scarce.Mikesim, Have your ridden in Colorado lately? I know I know, it's the winter freeze and thaw cycle that is hard on roads here. Tell that to my vehicle suspensions and my back. That excuse only goes so far. Design the road specs that take that into consideration and then find a contract office that will award it to a contractor that will build to that spec. And follow up with honest non kickback inspections. I wonder why Kansas, New Mexico, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Utah roads are a lot smoother and in better shape than Colorado's.